Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 09:18:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2094A10A18B43199AD94F91E4461208256E9D29A398A0FF7617FB497FED28B9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The year in which the scandal occurred is not relevant. Suggested note therefore does not provide important added context. Such responses that nitpick details are better suited for in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792159537295741225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2094A10A18B43199AD94F91E4461208256E9D29A398A0FF7617FB497FED28B9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1716801480468
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17921595372957412252094A10A18B43199AD94F91E4461208256E9D29A398A0FF7617FB497FED28B9A