Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 17:10:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: AI was asked to predict reactions based on the faulty assumption that pyrolysis happens in real-world vaping (it does not; only with faulty methodology): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691517305033 Many peer-reviewed papers confirm this by testing actual vapes, finding toxins below levels of concern: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389420314060 https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/26/e1/e23.long https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M16-1107 https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/27/1/10 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230014002505 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792142430847861246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
  • createdAtMillis - 1716225012351
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179214243084786124649A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74