Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 08:27:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCFEB1DA0580A6B57384C986DAFB18C99CCDA394416DA6D2D476A1D4A4F6C077
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Tesla disabling replies would indeed not be a violation of the first amendment, OP is not referring to that - he's referring to the concept of freedom of speech itself, which disable replies clearly prevents speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792107587447755225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCFEB1DA0580A6B57384C986DAFB18C99CCDA394416DA6D2D476A1D4A4F6C077
  • createdAtMillis - 1716107258391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792107587447755225BCFEB1DA0580A6B57384C986DAFB18C99CCDA394416DA6D2D476A1D4A4F6C077