Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 22:17:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post states exactly what the article states. There is nothing to correct. Many people are writing notes about an old study which was used in part for this study, but is not the underlying study. Notes debunking an old study has nothing to do with this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792005780352418099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391
  • createdAtMillis - 1716157065510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792005780352418099BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391