Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 13:19:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post states exactly what the article states. There is nothing to correct. Many people are writing notes about an old study which was used in part for this study, but is not the underlying study. Notes debunking an old study has nothing to do with this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792005780352418099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716211150779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1792005780352418099284AA450292799A5DE7C8773CC7BEA8FFE44CEED42A829D02819FDA2851B8D5D