Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 20:24:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C9F2BE6C2DEC1D752A20858D4DD8D4140A9F8BB07E7237DB44BEB4B78CF4C6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post states exactly what the article states. There is nothing to correct. Many people are writing notes about an old study which was used in part for this study, but is not the underlying study. Notes debunking an old study has nothing to do with this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1792005780352418099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C9F2BE6C2DEC1D752A20858D4DD8D4140A9F8BB07E7237DB44BEB4B78CF4C6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716150291966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17920057803524180990C9F2BE6C2DEC1D752A20858D4DD8D4140A9F8BB07E7237DB44BEB4B78CF4C6F