Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 12:45:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C111EEE146D8697AC25051B2F430FE68514B9F795DD7966058472D31D4150CBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Eidelstein’s accusations in the now-deleted tweet were never proven right and remain speculative. No other writers have supported his claims. However, Geoff Nelson, who initially wrote a negative review of Swift's 'reputation,' later admitted he was encouraged to do so. https://x.com/popcrave/status/1573768330808160256?s=46 https://consequence.net/2017/11/album-review-taylor-swift-reputation/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791889197701140756
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C111EEE146D8697AC25051B2F430FE68514B9F795DD7966058472D31D4150CBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1716209119552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1791889197701140756C111EEE146D8697AC25051B2F430FE68514B9F795DD7966058472D31D4150CBE