Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 18:18:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88896DAE9DCBE5E58161D08F9400F82C525A7F4E08819B2A539FE1349D9E0B2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Eidelstein’s accusations in the now-deleted tweet were never proven right and remain speculative. No other writers have supported his claims. However, Geoff Nelson, who initially wrote a negative review of Swift's 'reputation,' later admitted he was encouraged to do so. https://x.com/popcrave/status/1573768330808160256?s=46 https://consequence.net/2017/11/album-review-taylor-swift-reputation/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791889197701140756
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88896DAE9DCBE5E58161D08F9400F82C525A7F4E08819B2A539FE1349D9E0B2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1716056300760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179188919770114075688896DAE9DCBE5E58161D08F9400F82C525A7F4E08819B2A539FE1349D9E0B2A