Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 22:14:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A8938377FC90A9EACA0390D2A112AE9379A6B63533C061CD5561EEBFEC1658F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Eidelstein’s accusations in the now-deleted tweet were never proven right and remain speculative. No other writers have supported his claims. However, Geoff Nelson, who initially wrote a negative review of Swift's 'reputation,' later admitted he was encouraged to do so. https://x.com/popcrave/status/1573768330808160256?s=46 https://consequence.net/2017/11/album-review-taylor-swift-reputation/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791889197701140756
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A8938377FC90A9EACA0390D2A112AE9379A6B63533C061CD5561EEBFEC1658F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716070474433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918891977011407562A8938377FC90A9EACA0390D2A112AE9379A6B63533C061CD5561EEBFEC1658F