Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 15:52:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html Aucune autre source ne vient corroborer ce post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791863344887894433
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1716133934920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1791863344887894433E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2