Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 20:09:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BF9E2EF8D93376D3D581B83B2011ECD40E4E6F4AC1D5D1DBC5DB19F65B89FC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html Aucune autre source ne vient corroborer ce post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791863344887894433
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BF9E2EF8D93376D3D581B83B2011ECD40E4E6F4AC1D5D1DBC5DB19F65B89FC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1716149343606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17918633448878944332BF9E2EF8D93376D3D581B83B2011ECD40E4E6F4AC1D5D1DBC5DB19F65B89FC2