Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 17:57:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0439F439D735EC776B8FC3ECB31E2FA35D836ACD53CBF1FD1A9F6D625F0991AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html Aucune autre source ne vient corroborer ce post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791863344887894433
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0439F439D735EC776B8FC3ECB31E2FA35D836ACD53CBF1FD1A9F6D625F0991AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1716055033289
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918633448878944330439F439D735EC776B8FC3ECB31E2FA35D836ACD53CBF1FD1A9F6D625F0991AA