Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 21:54:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52B8833C129FA7C2D691F8C5E44BE25E02C29BCEE6B36E4F8FB4A271CC464AFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Připojila-li osoba, která se má podle vykonatelného rozhodnutí soudu omluvit, k omluvě kritický komentář, nesplnila tím povinnost uloženou jí vykonávaným rozhodnutím. 20 Cdo 3272/2006 https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/nscr/20-cdo-3272-2006

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791839312687862170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52B8833C129FA7C2D691F8C5E44BE25E02C29BCEE6B36E4F8FB4A271CC464AFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1716069290817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179183931268786217052B8833C129FA7C2D691F8C5E44BE25E02C29BCEE6B36E4F8FB4A271CC464AFA