Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 20:47:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3BD58639E49A7A55C8CA4B9F4F862195544B90527A4A36F72E200A41D115B84D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Připojila-li osoba, která se má podle vykonatelného rozhodnutí soudu omluvit, k omluvě kritický komentář, nesplnila tím povinnost uloženou jí vykonávaným rozhodnutím. 20 Cdo 3272/2006 https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/nscr/20-cdo-3272-2006

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791839312687862170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3BD58639E49A7A55C8CA4B9F4F862195544B90527A4A36F72E200A41D115B84D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716065279118
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918393126878621703BD58639E49A7A55C8CA4B9F4F862195544B90527A4A36F72E200A41D115B84D