Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 11:23:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BC87664485C0259D687A66BB3C4E1559FA970629F8F74F9461DB0307546CE9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - En quoi est-ce erroné ? Le tweet cité n’a pas volontairement relevé les 10 premiers noms ? C’est une sélection, il a choisi de ne dévoiler que les 10 premiers. On peut contester ses intentions ou non, mais ça ne relève pas de l’utilisation des notes de communauté

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791831723249987990
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BC87664485C0259D687A66BB3C4E1559FA970629F8F74F9461DB0307546CE9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716117799236
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918317232499879906BC87664485C0259D687A66BB3C4E1559FA970629F8F74F9461DB0307546CE9D