Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 17:49:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C52EE633C864B0041206B723C32B55407428B8ABC2FF4E30A7A3DCA3BD693C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ondřej Prokop byl povinen soudním rozhodnutím zveřejnit omluvu, kterou následným dovětkem popřel (to je dle judikatury soudu považovano za neplatnou omluvu). Nyní vydává demagogicky podporu totoho svého postupu několika skalními fanoušky ANO za statečnost. https://x.com/oprokop/status/1791771724293251316?s=46&t=oq1u7cNT23gHfjlLf-znlQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791811971056046164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C52EE633C864B0041206B723C32B55407428B8ABC2FF4E30A7A3DCA3BD693C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1716054572313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918119710560461644C52EE633C864B0041206B723C32B55407428B8ABC2FF4E30A7A3DCA3BD693C5