Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 06:35:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4028929DAEDA0462745C80091CD22EC7A7B90554A12AD4617572A8DB29350DDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ondřej Prokop byl povinen soudním rozhodnutím zveřejnit omluvu, kterou následným dovětkem popřel (to je dle judikatury soudu považovano za neplatnou omluvu). Nyní vydává demagogicky podporu totoho svého postupu několika skalními fanoušky ANO za statečnost. https://x.com/oprokop/status/1791771724293251316?s=46&t=oq1u7cNT23gHfjlLf-znlQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791811971056046164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4028929DAEDA0462745C80091CD22EC7A7B90554A12AD4617572A8DB29350DDD
  • createdAtMillis - 1716100532087
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918119710560461644028929DAEDA0462745C80091CD22EC7A7B90554A12AD4617572A8DB29350DDD