Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 15:34:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E371DD1238EB051A94FB5C9E34A1BD47FE072A6D8A11300909300C4E9980A05
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ondřej Prokop byl povinen soudním rozhodnutím zveřejnit omluvu, kterou následným dovětkem popřel (to je dle judikatury soudu považovano za neplatnou omluvu). Nyní vydává demagogicky podporu totoho svého postupu několika skalními fanoušky ANO za statečnost. https://x.com/oprokop/status/1791771724293251316?s=46&t=oq1u7cNT23gHfjlLf-znlQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791811971056046164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E371DD1238EB051A94FB5C9E34A1BD47FE072A6D8A11300909300C4E9980A05
  • createdAtMillis - 1716046478755
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918119710560461642E371DD1238EB051A94FB5C9E34A1BD47FE072A6D8A11300909300C4E9980A05