Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 08:50:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FDE4C4D7CFE5E5BE10EAF392395A9191DDF9056787DF1BAE6F2F578D7C719B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ondřej Prokop byl povinen soudním rozhodnutím zveřejnit omluvu, kterou následným dovětkem popřel (to je dle judikatury soudu považovano za neplatnou omluvu). Nyní vydává demagogicky podporu totoho svého postupu několika skalními fanoušky ANO za statečnost. https://x.com/oprokop/status/1791771724293251316?s=46&t=oq1u7cNT23gHfjlLf-znlQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791811971056046164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FDE4C4D7CFE5E5BE10EAF392395A9191DDF9056787DF1BAE6F2F578D7C719B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1716108641240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918119710560461641FDE4C4D7CFE5E5BE10EAF392395A9191DDF9056787DF1BAE6F2F578D7C719B2