Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 18:49:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BB5023BBBB971459C9F8884FC530715CA9954CE660B130F76DAD9EBBA7A79C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ondřej Prokop byl povinen soudním rozhodnutím zveřejnit omluvu, kterou následným dovětkem popřel (to je dle judikatury soudu považovano za neplatnou omluvu). Nyní vydává demagogicky podporu totoho svého postupu několika skalními fanoušky ANO za statečnost. https://x.com/oprokop/status/1791771724293251316?s=46&t=oq1u7cNT23gHfjlLf-znlQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791811971056046164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BB5023BBBB971459C9F8884FC530715CA9954CE660B130F76DAD9EBBA7A79C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1716144542292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17918119710560461641BB5023BBBB971459C9F8884FC530715CA9954CE660B130F76DAD9EBBA7A79C5