Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 13:19:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44A9EA2C0BC2B6D61AE78CFB371DA9F076B66F6DA398B2F5C0D6E8F5F4EB5CB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. De OP doet feitelijk correcte claims. Tegenargumenten hoeven niet in een community note. Bovendien verwijst eerste community note naar bronnen die ondersteunend zijn aan de argumentatie van OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791721690524770786
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44A9EA2C0BC2B6D61AE78CFB371DA9F076B66F6DA398B2F5C0D6E8F5F4EB5CB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1716038367126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179172169052477078644A9EA2C0BC2B6D61AE78CFB371DA9F076B66F6DA398B2F5C0D6E8F5F4EB5CB2