Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 07:32:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD8537AB152AA7E85DAA20BD30EBDDC15DE1ADA0BC0F4402012B2CCC6376E101
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The source link provided by the contributor above supports the claim in the post of Koreaboo, written in the last two paragraphs. The court indeed rejected it due to lack of evidence. Please stop abusing community notes because of HYBE fanaticism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791707929693024366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD8537AB152AA7E85DAA20BD30EBDDC15DE1ADA0BC0F4402012B2CCC6376E101
  • createdAtMillis - 1716017524635
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1791707929693024366FD8537AB152AA7E85DAA20BD30EBDDC15DE1ADA0BC0F4402012B2CCC6376E101