Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 07:59:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FBA9F0426F96501602C7BE38108C0B63BA956DBDCABD5594EE386DB955EAB785
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The source link provided by the contributor above supports the claim in the post of Koreaboo, written in the last two paragraphs. The court indeed rejected it due to lack of evidence. Please stop abusing community notes because of HYBE fanaticism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791707929693024366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FBA9F0426F96501602C7BE38108C0B63BA956DBDCABD5594EE386DB955EAB785
  • createdAtMillis - 1716019141114
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1791707929693024366FBA9F0426F96501602C7BE38108C0B63BA956DBDCABD5594EE386DB955EAB785