Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 06:59:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC67171E408E75803FFC3FD2797759F4952048C3C27E720AB62AC22C0242FD1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The source link provided by the contributor above supports the claim in the post of Koreaboo, written in the last two paragraphs. The court indeed rejected it due to lack of evidence. Please stop abusing community notes because of HYBE fanaticism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791707929693024366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC67171E408E75803FFC3FD2797759F4952048C3C27E720AB62AC22C0242FD1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716015573855
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1791707929693024366AC67171E408E75803FFC3FD2797759F4952048C3C27E720AB62AC22C0242FD1D