Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 07:25:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E0733AD9ED53F43EC3B5E9FE042BE58F5AF9C79A9AC7159B1D0F1FAED5E863F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The source link provided by the contributor above supports the claim in the post of Koreaboo, written in the last two paragraphs. The court indeed rejected it due to lack of evidence. Please stop abusing community notes because of HYBE fanaticism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791707929693024366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E0733AD9ED53F43EC3B5E9FE042BE58F5AF9C79A9AC7159B1D0F1FAED5E863F
  • createdAtMillis - 1716017142706
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17917079296930243664E0733AD9ED53F43EC3B5E9FE042BE58F5AF9C79A9AC7159B1D0F1FAED5E863F