Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 09:36:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC42197447E9A3289D8179289C25535E731DE10DC0CD111EEBA43241AD2AA4EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A conclusão do autor advém de sua opinião pessoal a respeito do procedimento e suas consequências. Ademais, a nota é inverídica ao afirmar que a proibição "dificultava aborto", quando na verdade foi proibido apenas o procedimento específico, sem prejuízo de outros métodos. https://portal.cfm.org.br/noticias/resolucao-do-cfm-disciplina-o-uso-do-procedimento-em-caso-de-estupro-a-partir-da-22a-de-gestacao/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1791646370987643075
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DC42197447E9A3289D8179289C25535E731DE10DC0CD111EEBA43241AD2AA4EC
createdAtMillis - 1716025011357
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1791646370987643075DC42197447E9A3289D8179289C25535E731DE10DC0CD111EEBA43241AD2AA4EC