Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 05:45:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A44D0EC4F65606287C3F4804BDFF4818DB41010D42B400B6F86A95870C8BE70
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless and until there’s a reliable independent source asserting that Fuentes was hacked, there shouldn’t be a note on this tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791642142798131215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A44D0EC4F65606287C3F4804BDFF4818DB41010D42B400B6F86A95870C8BE70
  • createdAtMillis - 1716011156774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17916421427981312150A44D0EC4F65606287C3F4804BDFF4818DB41010D42B400B6F86A95870C8BE70