Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 10:49:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the current note just isn't good enough to decisively refute anything. The article about the extension, while it admits it's not good for controversial topics and does not work in realtime, the negative top comments act as proof that the disdain for the trailer is real.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791617096322777497
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
  • createdAtMillis - 1716029395904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179161709632277749704E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945