Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-17 22:35:42 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2039CE3B7170C89F3A30C51984819D977F28D7511953744AC1034BFAA4B09AB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qui est avancé par le tweet et l'article du Telegraph, il ne s'agit pas de décider de l'exclusion d'Israël mais d'évaluer la légalité de cette demande en vue d'un examen futur (“This legal assessment [...] will subsequently be forwarded to the Fifa council”) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/05/17/fifa-urgent-meeting-decide-israel-banned-palestine-hamas/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791531478263755099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2039CE3B7170C89F3A30C51984819D977F28D7511953744AC1034BFAA4B09AB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1715985342700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17915314782637550992039CE3B7170C89F3A30C51984819D977F28D7511953744AC1034BFAA4B09AB9