Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-17 19:28:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04BD68F461D4CB78B731F1253991767F727D8AE3E25FEC4D6B256199327E84B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qui est avancé par le tweet et l'article du Telegraph, il ne s'agit pas de décider de l'exclusion d'Israël mais d'évaluer la légalité de cette demande en vue d'un examen futur (“This legal assessment [...] will subsequently be forwarded to the Fifa council”) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/05/17/fifa-urgent-meeting-decide-israel-banned-palestine-hamas/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791531478263755099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04BD68F461D4CB78B731F1253991767F727D8AE3E25FEC4D6B256199327E84B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1715974103865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179153147826375509904BD68F461D4CB78B731F1253991767F727D8AE3E25FEC4D6B256199327E84B7