Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 00:59:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA55583FEA30409CA969D5D055011502CA0A3DC8623AE02E019B17F7A9B8B0C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

このコミュニティノートにおいては男女の養育費受給率の割合に対する言及がありますが、実数での記載ではないため母数の確認が必要です。 https://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/whitepaper/r01/zentai/html/zuhyo/zuhyo01-05-09.html また日本社会における男女の賃金格差や専業主婦パートなども母子家庭の経済状況に影響することを考慮する必要があります。 https://www.gender.go.jp/research/weekly_data/07.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791320127277068708
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA55583FEA30409CA969D5D055011502CA0A3DC8623AE02E019B17F7A9B8B0C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1715993964490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1791320127277068708DA55583FEA30409CA969D5D055011502CA0A3DC8623AE02E019B17F7A9B8B0C8