Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-17 18:41:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4087AF979AD546812F78E4CD0D10633A702C6FC1892F4ADA2A420606B5408BB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. "Literally" has been used in a non-literal sense for nearly two centuries by many of the English language's literary giants, and dictionaries reflect this usage: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/misuse-of-literally Once you remove the note's pedantry, all that's left is a personal opinion better left to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791294554366255549
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4087AF979AD546812F78E4CD0D10633A702C6FC1892F4ADA2A420606B5408BB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1715971262142
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17912945543662555494087AF979AD546812F78E4CD0D10633A702C6FC1892F4ADA2A420606B5408BB4