Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-17 12:10:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E6A1E5EFA60A012EC3C0F9B61D2839202C1A9A087A4F48A9D31F2C8E93145FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the post isn’t misleading, further claims are for the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791223695245037752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E6A1E5EFA60A012EC3C0F9B61D2839202C1A9A087A4F48A9D31F2C8E93145FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1715947805032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17912236952450377522E6A1E5EFA60A012EC3C0F9B61D2839202C1A9A087A4F48A9D31F2C8E93145FC