Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 17:07:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C24DA50F1CEFD3C8D9B490659DDF286E361454FC0A5C5F833351D7706800175A
Participant Details

Original Note:

La causa abierta no es por "difundir una nota de prensa desmintiendo un bulo", sino por difundir comunicaciones secretas entre abogado y fiscalía, conducta que supone un delito de revelación de secretos. No es procedente ni admisible cometer delitos para "desmentir un bulo". https://www.ondacero.es/emisoras/comunidad-madrid/colegio-abogados-madrid-decide-este-lunes-donde-lleva-reproche-fiscalia_2024031865f7f9e2cb58620001fb28b1.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791115649567051792
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C24DA50F1CEFD3C8D9B490659DDF286E361454FC0A5C5F833351D7706800175A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715879249850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1791115649567051792C24DA50F1CEFD3C8D9B490659DDF286E361454FC0A5C5F833351D7706800175A