Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 11:42:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793
Participant Details

Original Note:

川勝元知事の主張は静岡県の大井川の水問題であり、この記事は岐阜県でおきたことなので無関係です。 記事は以下の通り https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASS5G56HGS5GOIPE00QM.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791064587669995766
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793
  • createdAtMillis - 1715859729847
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17910645876699957666646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793