Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-16 10:05:16 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9E143421191BE2252D3847824E2FF74DCB42D370502A8467BE4F9C316BCB07C6
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (for UNCLOS) in 2016 ruled that China’s nine-dash line has NO legal foundation and that China’s activities in the PH 200 nautical mile EEZ infringes on Manila’s sovereign rights China has repeatedly rejected the ruling Sources: 1. https://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global-memos/hague-tribunals-south-china-sea-ruling-empty-provocation-or-slow-burning-influence 2. http://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/SOUTHCHINASEA-RULING/010020QR1SG/index.html
All Note Details