Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 06:45:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D67ABE1F8206708BF6DA418562F67DD04D1ECE3C141F432BFFD17906CB93F84
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the linked source article in the comments, this study COMBINED the 2014 data with other more recent data/studies. This is genuinely a new meta-analysis, it is not a claim based on data from 2014 alone as the currently proposed note claims. https://www.justfacts.com/news_non-citizen_voter_registration

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790933980398641537
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D67ABE1F8206708BF6DA418562F67DD04D1ECE3C141F432BFFD17906CB93F84
  • createdAtMillis - 1715841919484
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17909339803986415373D67ABE1F8206708BF6DA418562F67DD04D1ECE3C141F432BFFD17906CB93F84