Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 20:52:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Questioning the credibility and bias of the OP is a form of ad hominem argument. Although not all ad hominem arguments are fallacious, these arguments on their own (without a factual dispute of the content of their posts) are better suited for the replies rather than CN. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ad-hominem

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790822334963793968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716065550627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790822334963793968E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4