Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-20 20:41:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93BE4720991B24424429F9B88688BC9B24ECEA5B19E707EB33B84A2F8CECB433
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apsana implies that an ongoing disciplinary process, not subject to public comment, has already finished. She should wait for the findings. People cannot reply to her as she has locked replies and ignores quotes. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790741533622222928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93BE4720991B24424429F9B88688BC9B24ECEA5B19E707EB33B84A2F8CECB433
  • createdAtMillis - 1716237684070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179074153362222292893BE4720991B24424429F9B88688BC9B24ECEA5B19E707EB33B84A2F8CECB433