Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 15:52:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apsana implies that an ongoing disciplinary process, not subject to public comment, has already finished. She should wait for the findings. People cannot reply to her as she has locked replies and ignores quotes. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790741533622222928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1715788352292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790741533622222928858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1