Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 16:14:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 403228DF2A238C4BAE18D5FE3E37593EFE31E1A04158D1E4714D692B6E134760
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apsana implies that an ongoing disciplinary process, not subject to public comment, has already finished. She should wait for the findings. People cannot reply to her as she has locked replies and ignores quotes. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790741533622222928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 403228DF2A238C4BAE18D5FE3E37593EFE31E1A04158D1E4714D692B6E134760
  • createdAtMillis - 1715789653090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790741533622222928403228DF2A238C4BAE18D5FE3E37593EFE31E1A04158D1E4714D692B6E134760