Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 07:34:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CCE4D10AE5C055646B0B1967BDBD2624B10B64BCBBB6B85C172041DA1FCF9D62
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es engañoso porque evita decir que es en términos porcentuales Por otra parte el estudio al que se refiere el artículo realiza cálculos erróneos pues no tiene en cuenta la presión fiscal por trabajo y el IVA lo calcula como si gastarán lo mismo https://t.co/rUFD2UGk4E

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790644567252861113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CCE4D10AE5C055646B0B1967BDBD2624B10B64BCBBB6B85C172041DA1FCF9D62
  • createdAtMillis - 1715758458302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790644567252861113CCE4D10AE5C055646B0B1967BDBD2624B10B64BCBBB6B85C172041DA1FCF9D62