Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 07:39:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C28E7FE29EE01FC01A23E1815E0053DD2445B9D492F711871A2E5F5A30F7B9B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es engañoso porque evita decir que es en términos porcentuales Por otra parte el estudio al que se refiere el artículo realiza cálculos erróneos pues no tiene en cuenta la presión fiscal por trabajo y el IVA lo calcula como si gastarán lo mismo https://t.co/rUFD2UGk4E

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790644567252861113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C28E7FE29EE01FC01A23E1815E0053DD2445B9D492F711871A2E5F5A30F7B9B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1715758749306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790644567252861113C28E7FE29EE01FC01A23E1815E0053DD2445B9D492F711871A2E5F5A30F7B9B1