Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 08:02:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FE55D3834A4256B6917775FC2A37DEDD961D05291362104ACE13BB59193A9D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es engañoso porque evita decir que es en términos porcentuales Por otra parte el estudio al que se refiere el artículo realiza cálculos erróneos pues no tiene en cuenta la presión fiscal por trabajo y el IVA lo calcula como si gastarán lo mismo https://t.co/rUFD2UGk4E

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790644567252861113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FE55D3834A4256B6917775FC2A37DEDD961D05291362104ACE13BB59193A9D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1715760155099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17906445672528611132FE55D3834A4256B6917775FC2A37DEDD961D05291362104ACE13BB59193A9D7