Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 07:21:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E05EF610A893D59091B5ED44D3BB33CA15020A349557C121A27EDB5F74E7B1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Added context must be neutral and factual. Views on history and someone's profession are not neutral. Implying that the law and the scope given to it by the judges in this trial are self-evident or that they have no bearing on free speech is not factual but an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790538459083424224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E05EF610A893D59091B5ED44D3BB33CA15020A349557C121A27EDB5F74E7B1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715757660295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17905384590834242245E05EF610A893D59091B5ED44D3BB33CA15020A349557C121A27EDB5F74E7B1A