Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 10:34:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE2EDB84E9C13794780FF7F9169D3E65EAB6FE866D39DCDFFABA3BFFEAFFFE26
Participant Details

Original Note:

The £75 billion extra in defence spending assumes that spending would have otherwise remained constant in cash terms, which is a misrepresentation of the situation. If you assume spending would have remained at 2.3% GDP, the figure is more like £12 billion. https://ifs.org.uk/articles/empty-defence-spending-promises-are-shot-dark

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790474015108136969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE2EDB84E9C13794780FF7F9169D3E65EAB6FE866D39DCDFFABA3BFFEAFFFE26
  • createdAtMillis - 1715769260501
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790474015108136969DE2EDB84E9C13794780FF7F9169D3E65EAB6FE866D39DCDFFABA3BFFEAFFFE26