Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 20:27:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D555B0F65B4C81192E26475D9CEB31C5BFE12A5FE1D4C9BC4630C85111F83EF0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The £75 billion extra in defence spending assumes that spending would have otherwise remained constant in cash terms, which is a misrepresentation of the situation. If you assume spending would have remained at 2.3% GDP, the figure is more like £12 billion. https://ifs.org.uk/articles/empty-defence-spending-promises-are-shot-dark

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790474015108136969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D555B0F65B4C81192E26475D9CEB31C5BFE12A5FE1D4C9BC4630C85111F83EF0
  • createdAtMillis - 1715718447788
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1790474015108136969D555B0F65B4C81192E26475D9CEB31C5BFE12A5FE1D4C9BC4630C85111F83EF0