Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-15 02:05:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D49A18BEDDB4EF16B77328764F120FB5CF53F012B292B3330BDEEC4546ECBD3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The £75 billion extra in defence spending assumes that spending would have otherwise remained constant in cash terms, which is a misrepresentation of the situation. If you assume spending would have remained at 2.3% GDP, the figure is more like £12 billion. https://ifs.org.uk/articles/empty-defence-spending-promises-are-shot-dark

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790474015108136969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D49A18BEDDB4EF16B77328764F120FB5CF53F012B292B3330BDEEC4546ECBD3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1715738750736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790474015108136969D49A18BEDDB4EF16B77328764F120FB5CF53F012B292B3330BDEEC4546ECBD3D