Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 11:18:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F57EDFAA0691E449EA1F21B7FF60FDFCD5B5F4FCC45578D3D6C99B590E2AA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nenhuma das atividades profissionais ou eleitorais pretéritas da pessoa representa óbice à sua atual posição de pesquisadora (reconhecida, inclusive, pela BBC - https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c4nmx2gn708o.amp). A autora do tweet tenta distorcer e descredibilizar a pesquisadora apenas por com ela não concordar.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790252884061295044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F57EDFAA0691E449EA1F21B7FF60FDFCD5B5F4FCC45578D3D6C99B590E2AA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1715685481777
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179025288406129504400F57EDFAA0691E449EA1F21B7FF60FDFCD5B5F4FCC45578D3D6C99B590E2AA6