Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 22:44:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1ABC97F5A39D0CCEF834570E6A19D5933AF4BFFA87F0D37CE75D33B5A23E084
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report mentions waiting lists 29 times: "The length of the waiting list to access gender services has significant implications for this population." (p 21) "unmanageably long waiting lists." (p 37) "waiting list for specialist services in excess of 2 years" (p 77) https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790141559033479656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1ABC97F5A39D0CCEF834570E6A19D5933AF4BFFA87F0D37CE75D33B5A23E084
  • createdAtMillis - 1715640263014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790141559033479656D1ABC97F5A39D0CCEF834570E6A19D5933AF4BFFA87F0D37CE75D33B5A23E084